With the 2026 scoring season officially launched, we look forward to reviewing Social Good Organizations’ (SGOs) 2025 Financial Statements (FS) and Annual Reports (AR) as early as possible. Below is the schedule to ensure alignment with the 2026 campaign.
Published: January 27, 2026 | Geneva – Switzerland
With the 2026 scoring season officially launched, we look forward to reviewing Social Good Organizations’ (SGOs) 2025 Financial Statements (FS) and Annual Reports (AR) as early as possible. SGOs are encouraged to upload these documents directly to their SGO profile or to share a public link by email.
All 2026 rankings—including the World Top 200 SGOs, USA Top 100 SGOs, and Brazil Top 100 SGOs—will be officially published on Tuesday, June 24, 2026.
This page sets out the official schedule, participation principles, and scoring rules applicable to the 2026 edition.
As an independent media and scoring platform, thedotgood does not require mandatory payment for an SGO to be selected, scored, or ranked. Any SGO may be assessed, including non-members.
However, SGOs that wish to ensure inclusion as a contestant and benefit from structured follow-up, profile management, and related services are encouraged to join thedotgood as members.
Starting in 2026, membership will also provide access to the Leading SGOs Community, which will be formally introduced in the coming weeks.
For newcomer SGOs, participation requires that an official profile be created and maintained directly on the thedotgood website.
Please note that being scored does not automatically result in being ranked, as rankings are determined by relative performance and final scores.
In June 2012, The Global Journal commissioned an independent review of its own NGO ranking methodology — a candid, self-critical examination of how the Top 100 NGOs list was built, what it could and couldn’t claim, and where its real limitations sat.
Published in February 2013 and authored by Cecilia Cannon, then completing her PhD in Political Science/International Relations at Geneva’s Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (IHEID), the paper situates the ranking within a broader shift: after decades of largely unquestioned goodwill, NGOs entered a period of genuine public scrutiny in the years following the 2010 Haiti earthquake, as their scale, credibility, and accountability came under closer examination.
The paper outlines four stated aims behind the ranking: to showcase the genuine diversity of organisations operating under the “NGO” label; to evaluate them comparatively, across geography and activity; to stimulate real debate around impact, innovation, and sustainability; and to track how the sector changes year over year.